CoreSmart is built by Agama Solutions — a US IT staffing firm with 20 years of hiring intelligence. They know exactly which developers get kept when teams consolidate around AI. This programme exists because of that gap.
Zero card required · No obligation · Pay only if you continue
These are people who have built and shipped AI systems at scale. Their endorsement is a professional judgement on the curriculum.
"Most AI courses produce people who can talk about AI. CoreSmart produces people who can actually ship. The curriculum covers the same production-grade stack used in real enterprise systems, and every week delivers a usable artifact rather than just a certificate."
"Teams already have AI tools, but delivery velocity remains unchanged. CoreSmart's dual-track model addresses the real gap by helping Business Analysts specify agent behaviour and Developers govern AI systems at scale."
Agama Solutions has placed developers in US tech firms for 20 years. CoreSmart was created because they kept seeing the same gap.
Week 1 is free, live, and identical to every paid week. Not a highlights reel. Not a sampler.
5 days of async video content, plus weekend live classes. Same material, same instructors, same cohort as the paid programme. If it's not different from every other course you've taken, walk away. No invoice. No follow-up.
CoreSmart is a new firm. The instructors are not. Every claim is public and verifiable.
Former GenAI Coach at Google with a PhD in AI/ML. Vinay reviews every Cohort 1 capstone personally — evaluating your architecture decisions, engineering tradeoffs, and deployed system. A structural commitment possible only at founding cohort scale.
Built systems that power 750 million streams. Patent inventor. AAAI published researcher. 100+ conference talks. 15+ years at Twitch, Audible, EA, and Splash.
Production ML at Siemens with deep roots in enterprise AI systems at Infosys. Brings the practitioner view — what fails in production and what a large enterprise hiring manager tests for in a real interview.
Not tutorial clones. Named projects with your engineering decisions baked in. A hiring manager opens your GitHub and sees the gap between you and every other candidate.
5 days async video per week, weekend live classes. From LLM foundations to a deployed, governed, cost-optimised agentic system.
Opens with live code in hour one — streaming API call, structured output, basic tool call. Topics: Model Layer Architecture, Retrieval + Tool + Memory Layers, Latency-Cost-Quality Triangle, Constitutional AI Concepts, RLHF & Alignment (30-min async reading).
Case Study: How Would You Design ChatGPT? — load balancing, context management, streaming infra, cost attribution, multi-tenant architecture. Produces a one-page architecture diagram.
Eval primer introduced here — every project from now asks: "How do I know this is working?" Topics: Transformer Behaviour in Practice, Context Windows, Prompting vs RAG vs Fine-Tuning vs Agents, Model Selection Framework, Golden Datasets + Thresholds, Frontier vs Open-Source Decision Criteria, SLM vs LLM.
3 progressive async sessions. Day 1 — prompting + structured outputs. Day 2 — tool calling. Day 3 — streaming + retry logic. Topics: System Prompt Design, Few-Shot Patterns, Pydantic v2 Schemas, Output Enforcement Progression (Prompt → JSON Mode → Pydantic → Tool Calling → Structured API), SSE Streaming, Retry & Validation Logic.
Topics: Embedding Models, Chunking Strategies, Metadata Design, Hybrid Retrieval, GPT-4o Vision + Claude Vision, PDF + Image + Table Ingestion, CLIP / OpenCLIP Embeddings, Nomic Embed (Multimodal), Index Maintenance.
Topics: RAG Pipeline Architecture, Citation Generation, Fallback Behaviour, Answer Confidence, Hallucination Controls, Conversation State.
Topics: Query Transformation (HyDE), Step-Back Prompting, Reranking, Multi-Query Retrieval, Context Compression, Before/After Benchmarking.
Case Study: How Would You Design GitHub Copilot? — code embedding, retrieval pipeline, latency constraints, large-repo context management, feedback loops.
The mature eval harness — eval instinct already established in Week 2. Topics: Inter-Rater Reliability, Evaluator Bias in LLM Judges, Prompt Sensitivity, Statistical Significance in A/B Tests, Dataset Leakage Prevention, LLM-as-Judge Pipeline, Multi-Model Scoring (5 Providers), User Feedback → Eval Loop.
Includes a 30-min LoRA mechanics explainer: low-rank decomposition, rank 8 vs rank 64 tradeoffs — genuine mechanical intuition before the code. Topics: When Fine-Tuning Wins, PEFT/LoRA on Llama 3/Mistral, Hugging Face Training Pipeline, Ollama Local Inference, OpenAI Fine-Tuning API (GPT-4o-mini), SLM Routing, Proprietary vs Open-Source Cost/Control/Privacy.
Build the agent loop from first principles before touching any framework. The "when NOT to use agents" case study is weighted equally to the build. Topics: Workflows vs Agents (with explicit Reject exercise), Tool Loops & Stop Conditions, Agent Design Patterns (ReAct, Reflection), Short-Term / Workflow / Persistent State, State Diagrams as Deliverables.
Explicit "reject multi-agent" case study — students must argue against multi-agent for a specific scenario. Topics: Routing & Handoffs, Manager-Worker Patterns, Graph Orchestration (LangGraph), OpenTelemetry Tracing, In-Context Memory, External Memory (Vector Store), Episodic Memory, Procedural Memory, Memory Lifecycle Management.
Topics: MCP Architecture & Tool Design, Publishing MCP Servers, A2A Protocol (Agent Cards), Client-Remote Architecture, Task Lifecycle & SSE Streaming, JWT/OIDC Security, AGENTS.md Spec Files.
Case Study: Production Multi-Agent System Design — orchestration at scale, agent isolation, handoff protocols, trace architecture, failure recovery, cost visibility.
Topics: Prompt Injection Defense, Tool Misuse Prevention, Approval Checkpoints + Audit Logging, PII Detection (Microsoft Presidio), NER-Based Entity Scrubbing, Output PII Filtering, PII in RAG Pipelines, Responsible AI Framework, Bias & Fairness Awareness, HITL Design Patterns, GDPR/CCPA in AI Systems.
Topics: Repo Intelligence Agents, CI/CD Context + PR Assistance, Streaming Chat UI (SSE + React), Citation Rendering, Tool Trace Display, Approval Action UI, Thumbs Up/Down + Correction Flows, Feedback Storage → Eval Harness, Online vs Offline Eval Loop.
Topics: Docker + CI/CD, Cloud Deployment, OpenTelemetry + Tracing, Monitoring + Alerting, Model + Prompt Versioning, Dataset Versioning, Async Background Jobs, Batch Processing Pipelines.
Case Study: AI Observability System Design — token-level cost tracking, latency percentiles, model drift detection, eval regression, incident response.
This week gets its own space — not compressed with deployment. Topics: Hallucination Debugging Decision Tree, Prompt Versioning in Git, Model Upgrade Control (A/B, Frozen Test Sets), Pydantic Response Enforcement Patterns, Parsing Fallback Strategies, Retry + Backoff Architecture, When Structured Output Breaks.
Students measure and optimise their actual costs on their actual workload. Topics: Prompt Caching (Anthropic/OpenAI), Intelligent SLM/LLM Routing, Per-Request Cost Budgets, Cost Dashboards + Measurement, Event-Driven Webhook Triggers, Agentic SRE Patterns, Pause/Resume + Human Approval.
Topics: Production Polish, Full Red-Team Review, Eval + Reliability Report, Architecture Case Study, Responsible AI Checklist, Cost Analysis, Technical Storytelling.
Enter your numbers. We show you the payback period. No salary guarantee — just arithmetic. Verify it yourself.
These are your numbers on your inputs. CoreSmart makes no salary guarantee. The job offer depends on the interview. The capability to earn it is the CoreSmart commitment.
The free week costs nothing. After that, the decision is yours — with full information.
Cohort 1 is 40 developers. Vinay Bamil reviews every capstone personally — your architecture decisions, your engineering tradeoffs, your deployed system. This will not be true for Cohort 5. The instructor-to-student ratio that makes this possible exists only now. The founding cohort also shapes the curriculum in real time.
Week 1 — 5 days async video, weekend live classes. Same instructors, same cohort, same depth as the paid programme. Walk away if it is not the right fit.